
"Sticker
Shock" Hits Industrial Tenants
|

Example of a
30,000-sq.-ft. industrial property with
20-foot clear height |
United Properties has been following the
construction costs of a typical 30,000-sq.-ft.,
precast industrial shell with 20-foot clear height.
The cost to construct this building, excluding land
costs, was $1,908,600 in 2004. However, with rising
costs in construction and raw materials, the price
tag in 2006 is $2,239,500—a 16.7% increase. Within
this increase, the shell building costs rose 16.1%,
and tenant improvements (TIs) increased 15.5%.
"Shell
and tenant improvement costs are up, and that
certainly is having an impact on tenants'
willingness to execute new deals," says Mark Sims,
United Properties' vice president – Industrial
Brokerage. "What used to be in the
$40-per-square-foot range is now actually pricing at
$50 a foot for standard office tenant improvements."
Shell Plus TI Costs
Create Ripple Effect
"On
top of rising hard costs, most cities are requiring
users and developers to present new development
plans that have a mixture of uses," Sims says. "It's
a more complicated and time-consuming
master-planning process, which equates to higher
costs as well."
Tony DelDotto, senior associate – Industrial
Brokerage at United Properties, says the most
discussed and anticipated effect of rising
construction costs is the upward pressure those
costs continue to have on lease rates.
"Currently,
we're working with a developer on a potential
speculative project, and even with reasonable land
cost, the construction numbers are demanding that we
pro forma bulk warehouse rates in the neighborhood
of $4.50 to $4.75 per square foot to even consider
the project," he says. "These numbers leave very
little wiggle room for error and put significant
pressure on predicting the future. We're starting to
see more and more warehouse lease comps over $4.50
per square foot, but it still requires tremendous
faith that such rates can be consistently achieved
in a new project."
DelDotto says in some cases, new construction costs
are even putting downward pressure on inflated value
expectations of land sellers.
"In
a couple of cases, we've seen developers
aggressively put sites under contract, but after
determining construction costs they're forced to
renegotiate with the land seller or even abandon the
project altogether," he says. "The landowners are
forced to either reduce their price or hold out to
see if someone else can make the numbers work."
Despite the increased costs associated with new
construction, most tenants will pay more for
functional, state-of- the-art space in the right
location, DelDotto points out.
"Older,
less functional buildings continue to lose deals to
these properties, regardless of significantly
reduced rates. Eventually the cost savings delta
will persuade tenants to accept less-efficient space
in return for low rent. In many cases, however,
almost no price can overcome a tenant's demand for
functional space."
Return to the "Construction Cost Index" Feature